3 Models legals per exigir transparència a Google, X i Europol
Instrucció: Copia cada bloc. Canvia [ONG] per Access Info, Privacy International, Statewatch o Xnet. Envia des de correu anònim. Tu no constes.
1. Model DSA Article 17 contra Google
Objecte: Obligar Google a dir si ha censurat contingut sobre Palantir, Europol, CNI, Pegasus.
To: dsa-escalations@google.com
From: [email ONG]
Subject: Article 17 DSA – Request for Statement of Reasons – Restrictions on political speech re Palantir, Europol, CNI – Submitted by [ONG] in public interest
[ONG], registered legal entity, pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2022/2065 Article 17, requests a clear and specific statement of reasons regarding any restriction applied by Google to content discussing Palantir Technologies, Gotham, Europol, CNI and Pegasus since 1 January 2022.
Legal basis:
1. Article 17 DSA: Obligation to provide statement of reasons for any restriction: removal, demonetization, de-indexing, visibility reduction, shadow ban. DOUE 32022R2065
2. Article 14 DSA + Article 11 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights: Terms must respect freedom of expression. Carta DDFF UE Art.11
3. Article 10 European Convention on Human Rights: Any interference must be prescribed by law, necessary and proportionate. CEDH Art.10
4. Article 22 GDPR: Right not to be subject to automated decision-making without human review. DOUE 32016R0679
Request:
1. Confirm if any visibility restriction, de-indexing or demonetization was applied to lawful content on these topics.
2. If yes: date, content, legal basis, and Article 20 DSA human review.
3. If no: issue written confirmation.
Deadline: 1 month, Article 17(4) DSA.
Non-compliance will be reported to CNMC as Spanish DSA Coordinator and used before the European Court of Human Rights for violation of Article 10 ECHR.
[ONG][adres][data]
2. Model DSA Article 17 contra X / Twitter
Objecte: Obligar X a dir si ha aplicat shadow ban per parlar d’Europol-Palantir.
To: dsa-complaints@x.com
From: [email ONG]
Subject: Article 17 & 20 DSA – Statement of Reasons – Censorship of debate on Palantir, Europol, CNI – Submitted by [ONG]
[ONG], under Article 17 DSA, requests statement of reasons for any restriction imposed by X Corp on lawful content containing terms: Palantir, Gotham, Europol, CNI, Pegasus, CatalanGate since 1 Jan 2022.
Legal basis:
1. Article 17 DSA: Statement of reasons mandatory for any restriction including visibility reduction. DOUE 32022R2065
2. Article 11 EU Charter: Freedom of expression. Political speech on public spending enjoys highest protection. Carta Art.11
3. Article 10 ECHR: Censoring debate on police use of AI fails proportionality test. CEDH Art.10
4. CJEU C-401/19 Poland v Parliament: DSA must comply with Charter. C-401/19
Request: Confirm restrictions, provide details, or issue negative certificate. 1 month deadline.
Failure to reply will be reported to Coimisiún na Meán Ireland and ECHR.
[ONG][adres][data]
3. Model Reglament 1049/2001 contra Europol – 69 documents Palantir
Objecte: Obligar Europol a alliberar o motivar un per un els 67 docs tancats sobre Gotham.
To: access-to-documents@europol.europa.eu
From: [email ONG]
Subject: Regulation 1049/2001 – Access to 69 documents Europol-Palantir – Submitted by [ONG] in public interest
[ONG], pursuant to Article 15 TFEU, Article 42 EU Charter and Regulation 1049/2001, requests access to the 69 documents identified by Europol concerning its contractual and operational relationship with Palantir Technologies, including Gotham software.
Legal basis:
1. Article 15 TFEU: Right of access to documents of Union bodies. TFUE Art.15
2. Article 42 Charter: Right of access to documents. Carta Art.42
3. Regulation 1049/2001 Article 4: Exceptions require specific and actual harm, document-by-document. DOUE 32001R1049
4. CJEU T-214/13 ClientEarth: Generic reference to public security insufficient. T-214/13
Facts: Lighthouse Reports 2024 and Statewatch 2024 confirm 69 docs exist, 67 denied. Public interest overrides secrecy given use of AI on 800M citizens.
Request:
1. Full access to 69 documents.
2. If redaction, partial access per Article 4(6) with individual harm test.
3. Index of 69 docs: title, date, author.
Deadline: 15 working days, Article 7(1).
Appeal: Confirmatory application, EU Ombudsman, CJEU Article 263 TFEU.
[ONG][adres][data]
Com publicar-ho sense rastre
- Usa Tails OS en USB. Tot va per Tor.
- Crea correu a Protonmail sense telèfon.
- Envia des de wifi pública. No des de casa.
- Guarda resposta. Si deneguen o callen, tens prova de violació de DDHH per TEDH.
Recorda: Si cites BOE i DOUE, no és opinió. És llei. Censurar llei és censura de l’Estat contra si mateix.
